Amazon's Top 5 – Anti Radiation Phone Case Review

Amazon's Top 5 – Anti Radiation Phone Case Review

We put anti-radiation iPhone X cases to the test. Here is our results:

1. Tempered Glass –

2. Defender Series –

3. RadiArmor –

4. Waves Protect –

5. The Pouch –

The EMF Meter –


  1. Bisdak Pinoy on June 21, 2020 at 7:04 pm

    By waving your tester makes a radiation itself

  2. Who's in da House! on June 21, 2020 at 7:06 pm

    Obviously you don’t understand RF

  3. Brandon on June 21, 2020 at 7:09 pm

    you have the microwave on in the background you wonderfully dumb internet troll

  4. Karen Shelton on June 21, 2020 at 7:12 pm

    You’re picking up EMFs in the granite counter tops dude.

  5. Sylvia West on June 21, 2020 at 7:13 pm

    I have a meter similar to yours they do NOT read all frequencies that were present during your test, this meter test low frequency range, It does Not do Medium to High freq range that cell phones put out. Also you do Not wave the meter around like in the video Wrong! this test was Not that useful. A trifield Meter can test a Much wider freq. range

  6. Eli Shozen on June 21, 2020 at 7:19 pm

    I can’t speak for all the other cases in your test, but I highly suggest that you test the RadiArmor case WITHOUT the phone first. I have the same EMF reader and I discovered that the EMF shielding is so good that it was actually picking up the EMF from the reader itself, not the phone. Please test it for yourself. I later used a more accurate EMF reader and I can confirm that the RadiArmor case does indeed block high frequency RF very effectively.

  7. Shield Your Body on June 21, 2020 at 7:20 pm

    I am the CEO of SYB, and we make the Phone Pouch that you tested in your video. And I wanted to take this opportunity to respond to your test.

    First, I would like to thank you very much for taking the time to test these products. Given the increasing number of sources of human-made EMF in our environment, I encourage more people to learn how to test for themselves.

    Now, regarding your test of our Phone Pouch, your measurements are from the front of our Pouch. This, unfortunately, means that your test does not actually test the shielding performance of our Pouch.

    This is because the front of our Phone Pouch — the side you tested — is unshielded. It’s the rear of our Pouch that is the shielded side.

    This is an intentional design element of our Pouches. By shielding the rear of the Pouch, but not the front, our Pouch deflects harmful EMF radiation away from your body when you carry your phone — without negatively impacting your phone’s reception or battery life.

    So taking measurements off the front of the Pouch would not be an accurate way to measure our product claims. You would need to take measurements from the back of the Pouch, as we do in this testing video:

    I would really appreciate it if you might consider redoing your test to measure the rear side of our Pouch that provides protection against radiation.

    I would also note, as other commenters have, that when taking tests such as these, you should not wave around your meter — that is not a way to get an accurate reading. You can take readings in multiple positions, but you should hold each position for at least a few seconds to get a reliable reading.

    We cover this, and include several other tips, in the free ebook I wrote explaining how to conduct tests such as these. You can download that ebook, and see other EMF testing resources, here on our website:

    One final note, your meter is designed to detect low frequency (or ELF) magnetic and electric EMF radiation. That is important, but it is also important to measure the radio frequency (RF) and/or microwave (MW) frequency ranges of EMF radiation, which are the frequencies utilized for wireless communication. My ebook recommends a few meters that will do this. And, as one other commenter noted, the TriField is a great option because it includes an ELF-electric, ELF-magnetic and RF meter all in one, for a reasonable price.

    Thank you once again for performing these tests. I really appreciate it when customers take the time to verify our product claims, and those of our competitors. I also hope that you will consider re-doing your test of our Pouch, by taking measurements off of the rear side of our Pouch, which is the side that provides protective shielding.


    R Blank
    Shield Your Body

  8. the truthHurtz on June 21, 2020 at 7:21 pm

    Your meter is unreliable.

  9. nirvana 211 on June 21, 2020 at 7:22 pm

    Electromagnetic radiation is not dangerous like some people believe. Your phone will not give you cancer and nor will your microwave. The only radiation that gives you cancer is nuclear radiation.

  10. Michael Grady - Extreme BASS Guitar on June 21, 2020 at 7:25 pm

    Horrible tests

  11. Paul Clark on June 21, 2020 at 7:25 pm

    What were the resulting power levels? You really did not know what you were doing here

  12. NickRisley on June 21, 2020 at 7:26 pm

    can you guys test the little anti radiation stickers?

  13. Georgio OM on June 21, 2020 at 7:27 pm

    Would be nice to see what the reading was properly and accurately without any phone case as the reading without a phone cases was not talked about or held in place so you could see it.

    For all we know even they case with the lowest reading could have been the same as the phone ringing without the case? Pointless.

  14. Rick Kenny on June 21, 2020 at 7:28 pm

    You need a Trifield meter for better accuracy but yes everyone should have an EMF case for cell phone and tablets/laptops too

  15. Jonathan UK on June 21, 2020 at 7:31 pm

    Surprised you didn’t try RF safe as I feel they are better than all the cases you had on this video.

  16. RadiArmor on June 21, 2020 at 7:31 pm

    Below is a video on how to test the RadiArmor case using several common types of EMF readers, including the Meterk that is being used in this video.

    You’ll notice that testing shielding efficacy can be a little tricky depending on the EMF reader. In this instance, the Meterk is reacting the EMF blocking liner, not what’s coming off the phone.

  17. Alycia Morris on June 21, 2020 at 7:33 pm

    This is faulty testing…no one should wave the tester around! It will produce inaccurate results every single time.

  18. Kent Erz on June 21, 2020 at 7:35 pm

    First of all there is no pruf that this type of radiation that the phones are exerting is dangerous ,if you doesn’t know it visible light is also a type of radiation so the world radiation doesn’t mean completely nothing ,that type of radiation is not ionizing which means that it can not damage the structure of your DNA so it can not cause cancer as many claim.
    Secondly i have acived the same thing with 0.05 dollars worth of aluminium foil ,which means that there is no reason for that pricing.
    Furthermore if your phone is inded realy shielded the wifi and every kind of communication that it allows will be gone so is practicly usles for some applications.

  19. E J on June 21, 2020 at 7:35 pm

    Excellent video bro!! So everybody who keeps there cell phones in there pocket must be getting tons of radiation!!

  20. Abseiduk on June 21, 2020 at 7:38 pm

    The radiation without any protection was 44, but your waving that reader around so no one can see anything- than you quickly move on and the best protector is 44.???

    What kinda nonsensical experiment is this?

  21. Danny Collier on June 21, 2020 at 7:38 pm

    Why are they waving the meeter like fanning a fart? Anyway not one of the cases have I seen on any test stop the radiation

  22. Malia on June 21, 2020 at 7:39 pm

    Your review makes me not trust ANY of these.. You scanned the microwave oven to show that the tester did something but no information of readings.. Then on each case same thing, too fast to provide readings. And it would help to get a baseline on the phone before putting into cases.. AND you probably would get a more accurate result if the phone was set to a call while the internet is also running on a active site.. You can do better next time.

  23. 5G will kill us unless we dont stop it on June 21, 2020 at 7:43 pm

    You cant put a price on your health. Is it better to spend a little more money and have a smaller chance of not getting cancer? Or is it better to save like $50 and have to pay thousands of dollars on chemotherapy? which will likely just kill you instead of the cancer. (cancer is curable along with every other disease. I would know, im a natural healer and have cured many people. Do your research before you try chemo.)

  24. Kill The Kardashians on June 21, 2020 at 7:44 pm

    Beeping as a sign of emf is a very broad and general way of measuring emf and rf. It seems some of these cases semi protect and others protect. When you shake the meter around it makes it very hard for the viewer to determine to what extent these devices work (i.e observe frequency change) which would be valueable info. You have done this diligence so thank you for purchasing and testing these cases. Some people refrain from mentioning company names so it was nice to see a classic product video on emf protectors. Peace guys

  25. Beans Rice on June 21, 2020 at 7:46 pm

    You guys should do this test again after reading the advice from Shield Your Body. Not waving around the tester and turning over their pouch, to the back where it is actually protected.

  26. Senor Pablo on June 21, 2020 at 7:46 pm

    The radiation protection in the pouch is on the back side. You need to flip it over to test it.

  27. KATHY VELARDI on June 21, 2020 at 7:49 pm

    Granite counters emit some radiation…testing results might be more accurate on another surface.

  28. Sarosh Khan on June 21, 2020 at 7:52 pm
  29. Wratheon 1776 on June 21, 2020 at 7:52 pm

    Do these companies have any legitimate claims or is everything just fake to steal your money?

  30. jess jesse on June 21, 2020 at 7:54 pm

    Cheap efm ! Get expensive and you see the radiation of iphones = disease level ! Iphone = danger !

  31. vegan life bear medium on June 21, 2020 at 7:55 pm

    I use that emf meter in blue it like £15 off amazon and it’s not accurate often does miss reads as a paranormal investigation team worker
    I use different emf meters as the e11 is inaccurate

  32. I AM DOCTORCAT on June 21, 2020 at 7:55 pm

    I have problem with front screen hurt my jaw and tooth

  33. Wayne Robinson on June 21, 2020 at 7:58 pm

    Funny how the reading without the cases was the same as with the case on , you for got to mention that 🤫 waving the phone around so we can’t see it doesn’t help , but pausing the vid makes it really clear

Leave a Comment